In recent years, AI language models like ChatGPT have gained popularity for their ability to generate coherent responses to various topics. However, with this rise in popularity comes concerns over the potential misuse of AI-generated text. In response to these concerns, ChatGPT’s creators at OpenAI have launched a new tool to detect whether or not a piece of text was written by artificial intelligence. At the same time, schools across the country are beginning to ban the use of AI-generated text in academic settings.
Here, we will explore the new tool from OpenAI, the reasons behind the ban in schools, and what this means for the future of AI language generation. So please sit back, relax, and let’s dive into the exciting world of AI language generation and the efforts to ensure its responsible use.
The newly released tool from ChatGPT seeks to assist educators in determining if a written text was created by artificial intelligence or by a student. Thus, it allows teachers to distinguish AI-written materials from those authored by people.
At schools and universities, there are discussions about the possibility that OpenAI’s new text classifier, ChatGPT, might inspire academic impropriety and interfere with student education. With its capabilities granting it the capacity to write anything imaginable from a prompt, there is genuine cause for concern.
The alignment team at OpenAI has a method to detect AI-written text, and the head of this team is responsible for it.
The head of OpenAI’s alignment team, Jan Leike, says:
“Is imperfect and it will be wrong sometimes,”
“Because of that, it shouldn’t be solely relied upon when making decisions.”
Millions have been exploring ChatGPT since its launch as an OpenAI website-based free application in November. Though several appreciated the potential uncapped use, the simplicity of using the app to write answers for test questions and assignments has caused worry among teachers.
Questions raised involve the possibility that this tool will be misused to commit cheating or plagiarism, due to which many universities have been forced to make changes in their exams swiftly, topics for essays, and protocols for honoring integrity.
ChatGPT has already been banned in New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, and Tasmania public schools.
Cheating at universities is a concerning issue, which was stressed by Julia Powles, the University of Western Australia’s law professor. She voiced her opinion on the matter, feeling apprehensive about such practices.
Julia Powles says:
“If you’re setting assessments that could be addressed simply by drawing on web resources, then you may have a problem.”
“Ever since we’ve had the ability to search the web or access material on Wikipedia, people have been able to draw on digital resources.”
OpenAI stated that in addition to prospectively mitigating plagiarism, their detection tool could also be useful in recognizing automated disinformation efforts or any misusage of AI as human-like conversations. Despite this, the company underlined the constraints surrounding the tool with a blog post.
Capacity and accuracy increase when a longer passage of text is employed to determine whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) or a human has crafted something.
The tool labels text as “very unlikely, unlikely, unclear if it is, possibly or likely” AI-generated. It’s not easily understood how the result was determined, however.
Ms. Leike says:
“We don’t fundamentally know what kind of pattern it pays attention to, or how it works internally,”
“There’s really not much we could say at this point about how the classifier actually works.”
ChatGPT and any other AI tools cannot produce written or oral work at Sciences Po in France. Going against this rule could lead to an immediate expulsion from the institute.
As ChatGPT’s creator, OpenAI launched a new tool that detects if the text is written by artificial intelligence, and schools are banning its use. Despite the benefits of using artificial intelligence to improve writing skills, some feel it gives an unfair advantage to those with access to it. For now, it seems that the backlash against AI-assisted writing will continue.