Are you a robot? If someone asked you this, what would your answer be? It’s not a silly question; it’s one that companies like Bloomberg are now using to identify and categorize job applicants. Many businesses are turning to artificial intelligence-based algorithms that automatically analyze resumes and measure how well potential candidates fit their desired skill sets.
But while these AI-powered tools provide more transparency into the hiring process, they can also leave many people feeling they’re being treated like machines rather than humans. So if someone asks you, “are you a robot?” the right answer is no – because technology should never replace genuine human connections for recruiting purposes!
Reid Hoffman, the co-founder of LinkedIn, is resigning from the board of OpenAI – a ChatGPT manufacturer. This move comes as his venture capital firm invests in other AI businesses, including those utilizing OpenAI’s offerings.
In a LinkedIn post, Hoffman noted that when considering AI, it’s crucial to consider more than just one application, business, or sector since its effects will be far-reaching.
Hoffman is a partner at Greylock Partners and sits on the board of Microsoft Corp., which purchased LinkedIn in 2016 and has invested in OpenAI.
Ultimately, Bloomberg’s assessment system raises an interesting question for us to ponder: Are we being evaluated on our intelligence and skills, or are we being judged by a computer algorithm? We must consider how automation impacts the job market and how this might affect those looking for employment. While it likely won’t replace all human evaluations shortly, the potential of such technology is intriguing.
We now have systems that analyze candidates more thoroughly than could a single interviewer, and they can sort applicants based on their skill set. As technology advances in this area, one thing is certain – machines are becoming smarter every day. It will be up to each individual to decide if they want to battle AI algorithms when applying for jobs – but only time will tell what the fallout of such decisions may be.
Source: bloomberg.com
